Conclusion

History and fiction are, by definition, two warring elements. As a result, historical fiction may sound like a quixotic idea. There has been, nonetheless, a rather substantial amount of historical reconstructions ranging from novels and comics, to films and television series. The genre is not a novel one and there is an abundance of historical novels that prove the legitimacy of this assertion. Sir Walter Scott, for instance, was doubtless the most influential historical novelist of the 19th century. Blackadder belongs to an especial variety of satirical television series sitcom and, to my knowledge, has not been emulated since.
After having watched the entire series for the eleventh time, I find that there are still references and details that I had not previously discovered or paid attention to. The articles in this blog are a reflection of my understanding and appreciation of the second half of the series series.
The pervading theme in Blackadder is comedy, which is the grounds on which all commentaries and satire are based.
 This short essay will show to what extent Blackadder qualifies as a commendable representation of historical events.

Thanks to the sitcom format, the writers were able to create a variety of situation wherein the protagonists each fall into a certain social category. So far I have not mentioned the second season.
Blackadder II (succeeded by the telling under-title "Being a true and japesome historie of Elizabethan Englande") is set in England during the reign of Elizabeth I. We have the occasion to see an insightful depiction of the interaction between all the protagonists I have mentioned above. Queen Elizabeth I, whose portrayal by actress Miranda Richardson has been described by co-star Steven Fry
as superior to all previous performances including that of Helen Mirren and Cate Blanchett, is depicted in the series as a capricious and ruthless ruler. She is almost always followed by her nurse whom she calls 'nursy'. The other main characters are: Lord Blackadder, Lord Percy, Lord Melchett and, naturally, Baldrick. The portrait of the Queen is quite uncanny, the way she effortlessly threatens to behead anyone who offend her - regardless of their station and no matter how august they are - on a whim is evidently exaggerated but that is precisely the point.

 The real Elizabeth I might not have been that excitable but the breathtakingly unrelenting performance of Miranda Richardson breathes life into one's vision of the monarch, and few can boast to have made such an effect of the public. In a documentary on the series, the actress has remarked that she sometimes meet fans who make complete fools of themselves trying to duplicate her lines.
In the first episode of Blackadder II, Blackadder nurses a secret love for his new servant 'Bob', a women disguised as a boy who feels the same way (an obvious reference to Shakespeare's Twelfth Night). As everybody knows, homosexuality was very much frowned upon during that epoch. In order to 'cure' his 'condition' and save his reputation, Blackadder visits a healer who advises him frequent leeching. There are also numerous references to the persecution of Catholics. A specific theme is to be found in all four season, indeed portions of dialogue regarding the lower-classes are recurrent throughout the entire series. In Blackadder the Third for example: Blackadder addresses Prince George after an attempt on his life by anarchists "These are volatile times, your Highness, the American revolution lost your royal father the colonies, the French Revolution murdered brave king Louis[...]The whole world cries out 'peace, freedom and a few less fat bastards eating all the pie' "
The degree of exaggeration can be ridiculous and hilarious: "they are so poor they're forced to have children simply to provide a cheap alternative to turkey at Christmas. disease and deprivation stalk our land like two giant stalking things and the working man is poised to overthrow us."

There has been isolated criticisms regarding the lack of respect with regard to historical accuracy; especially with the final season, Blackadder Goes Forth.
The debate even took political proportion when Education Secretary Michael Gove, during the occasion of a commemoration, said
 "The conflict has, for many, been seen through the fictional prism of dramas such as Oh! What a Lovely War, The Monocled Mutineer and Blackadder as misbegotten shambles -a series of catastrophic mistakes perpretated by an out of touch elite." "Left wing academics all too happy to feed those myths by attacking Britain's role in the conflict"


While M Gove is perfectly entitled to his beliefs, individuals such as Blackadder star Sir Tony Robinson (see articles below) or the writers beg to differ. Blackadder, as Sir Tony so rightly said, is simply just another teaching tool. The series can teach someone history up to a point. It is up to the individual to form an opinion for himself by relying on more academic pieces. Blackadder, or any other historical fiction materials for that matter, do not presume to present themselves as authorities on History, the whole point is to create, not to retell. I am reminded of the debate (which can be found on YouTube) that followed Monty Python's Life of Brian, during the course of which Micheal Palin and John Cleese try to (or rather succeed to) defend their film against the wrath of the ecclesiastical world. Brian is not the Galilean Carpenter in the same way that Blackadder's Melchett is the quintessential WWI general.

Sources:
"Micheal Gove blasts "Blackadder myths"...":
Link: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2532923/Michael-Gove-blasts-Blackadder-myths-First-World-War-spread-television-sit-coms-left-wing-academics.html#ixzz2poRFJAcE

"Blackadder star Sir Tony Robinson in Michael Gove WWI row"
 Link: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-25612369